IS HIV A GENDER PRONOUN?
All gay men are considered either HIV negative or positive. In this article I consider if the HIV label could serve a second purpose to categorise the entire population of homosexuals. I have imagined a third gender 'hiv' to describe homosexual males and females, as distinct from heterosexuals who are either him or her.
And here comes some crazy. When we depart from science into common language (with multiple word definitions) something happens; we get a fusion of fiction and fact that somehow describes reality better than science.
What if HIV is a gender? What if HIV is a conspiracy to track gays? It may also be a blood borne disease (but so are children) but is there value or truth in my idea?
Could it be that a 'HIV'/ hiv is a man with the mind of a woman/ gay man? Could it be that scientists and government thought 'how can we track these genetic mutants?'
What if scientists thought up this answer: to link the hiv gender with a disease, track the disease and you track the gays.
What is AIDS then?
Aid is not just charity to third world countries, a man who has the mind of a woman (a hiv) needs 'aid' also. To accept himself, to live in peace.
AIDS is not just a disease, it is a problem for government, so are gays. So are left wing people sympathetic to foreign governments.
Now put it all together. Hiv gendered (-/+) men typically require aid from straight people/society. AIDS is when a gay man is unable to work, and is dependent on society.
Key: forget the disease attached to gays, just look at them as a third (new?) gender. This is the essence of my theory. To 'them' all gay men are labelled HIV, whether infected or not.
Also, governments have bigger concerns than minority populations. The title "World Aids Day" suggests that kind of panoptic global vision of control. Every one and every behaviour will be watched, here is your day, we are watching you.
My millennial generation has been saturated with transexual imagery, I can't help but fear this is a deliberate attempt to find a solution to the problem of homosexuality.
All gay men are considered either HIV negative or positive. In this article I consider if the HIV label could serve a second purpose to categorise the entire population of homosexuals. I have imagined a third gender 'hiv' to describe homosexual males and females, as distinct from heterosexuals who are either him or her.
And here comes some crazy. When we depart from science into common language (with multiple word definitions) something happens; we get a fusion of fiction and fact that somehow describes reality better than science.
What if HIV is a gender? What if HIV is a conspiracy to track gays? It may also be a blood borne disease (but so are children) but is there value or truth in my idea?
Could it be that a 'HIV'/ hiv is a man with the mind of a woman/ gay man? Could it be that scientists and government thought 'how can we track these genetic mutants?'
What if scientists thought up this answer: to link the hiv gender with a disease, track the disease and you track the gays.
What is AIDS then?
Aid is not just charity to third world countries, a man who has the mind of a woman (a hiv) needs 'aid' also. To accept himself, to live in peace.
AIDS is not just a disease, it is a problem for government, so are gays. So are left wing people sympathetic to foreign governments.
Now put it all together. Hiv gendered (-/+) men typically require aid from straight people/society. AIDS is when a gay man is unable to work, and is dependent on society.
Key: forget the disease attached to gays, just look at them as a third (new?) gender. This is the essence of my theory. To 'them' all gay men are labelled HIV, whether infected or not.
Also, governments have bigger concerns than minority populations. The title "World Aids Day" suggests that kind of panoptic global vision of control. Every one and every behaviour will be watched, here is your day, we are watching you.
My millennial generation has been saturated with transexual imagery, I can't help but fear this is a deliberate attempt to find a solution to the problem of homosexuality.
Comments
Post a Comment